CHELATION THERAPY
By
Lawrence Wilson, MD
©
June 2012, The Center For Development
Chelation therapy is the use of specific substances, either synthesized chemicals or
natural ones, to remove some toxic metals from a personÕs body. It is widely used by some holistic
doctors and naturopaths.
The word, to
chelate,
means to grab onto something.
Thus, chelating agents are substances that have a strong ability to grab
onto toxic metals and dislodge them from the tissues so they can be removed.
Chelation therapy is
completely different from the concept of chelated
minerals. The latter are
minerals that are tightly bound to specific mineral transporters so that they
are absorbed faster and better into the body inside the intestinal tract. In fact, our bodies naturally chelate or bind minerals in the stomach and intestines in
order to absorb them properly.
Chelation therapy,
however, has nothing to do with absorbing minerals. It has to do with removing minerals by the use of a specific
type of chemical that binds to them tightly and removes them from the body.
Overall recommendation. While helpful to remove some toxic metals, I would definitely avoid chelation
therapy. In all cases that I
have seen, it removes some vital minerals along with the toxic metals, and it
has other problems discussed below.
These minerals cannot be easily replaced with an IV bottle or with
nutritional supplements, as they are vital compounds the body makes, not simple
minerals.
Chelation therapy also is not needed to remove any toxic metal if one follows a
nutritional balancing program.
Also, chelation cannot remove metals nearly as
deeply as a nutritional balancing program, in my experience.
Even
drinking reverse osmosis water or distilled water are simple forms of chelation that should be avoided. Many people today are told
that the more they chelate their heavy metals, the
better. This is insane advice, as
this article will explain.
CHELATION THERAPY VERSUS BYPASS SURGERY
If I
had my choice, I would certainly choose chelation therapy
over bypass surgery. Bypass
surgery is much more invasive, much more costly and much more dangerous. In fact, it is a very dangerous and
usually unnecessary operation that usually leaves the patient with permanent
brain damage due to hours of breathing anesthesia, and usually the patient
requires drug therapy afterwards, as well.
Having
said all this, a better alternative than either chelation
or bypass surgery is a nutritional balancing program, in my experience. The latter removes all the toxic metals
much more deeply, is the safest by far, and is even less costly than the
alternatives. Only a nutritional
balancing program improves overall health, as well, by balancing all the major
mineral ratios in the body and restoring balance, total nutrition and vitality.
PROBLEMS
WITH ALL CHELATION
THERAPY
These
include the following:
1.
Random and erratic removal of vital minerals. All chelating agents, both natural and synthetic, remove
some essential mineral compounds from the body. This is a serious problem today for two main reasons. First, many people are already
extremely deficient in many essential minerals such as zinc, chromium,
molybdenum, vandium and others. If one removes even a little of the
essential minerals, the person can become much more ill, even though the
deficiency state can be subtle.
The other
problem with removing some essential minerals is that it further unbalances or upsets
the body chemistry, often in ways that are difficult to repair. For this reason, removing vital minerals
from the body in a random way is usually the worst problem with all chelation – synthetic or natural - that we observe.
Physicians
that offer chelation say they replenish the vital
minerals with either oral supplements or minerals added to an intravenous chelation bottle.
However, in our experience, replenishing minerals in the human body is a
delicate, exacting process and it cannot be done by just ÔdumpingÕ them into
the bloodstream or with random mineral supplements. Foods are best, in all cases, and this takes time and
patience to achieve. The mineral
compounds that are lost cannot be duplicated by simple oral or IV
supplementation.
2.
Unbalancing the body. Chelation rips toxic metals out of the body without regard
for the overall balance of the body chemistry. Replacing minerals with IV pushes and piles of vitamin pills
does the same thing, or worse.
If one
unbalances the body, the vitality always suffers, even if symptomatic
improvement occurs. This is a
major problem with chelation, using either natural
and synthetic chelating agents.
3.
The toxicity of many chelating agents.
All chelating agents are toxic or potentially toxic. The synthetic chelators
such as EDTA, DMPS, DMSA, penicillamine, deferoxamine and other drugs are known to be toxic for the
kidneys. They may also damage the
adrenal glands and perhaps other structures.
Dr. Paul Eck
found that IV chelation therapy tends to lower the
sodium/potassium ratio on a hair mineral analysis. This is always a bad sign.
The toxicity
may not be apparent, although some chelation
protocols demand that the doctor check the patientÕs liver and kidney
functioning periodically, for this reason. Unfortunately, normal liver and kidney blood tests are not
sensitive enough to detect subtle damage due to chelating agents.
Natural chelators such as high-dose vitamin C, zeolite,
chlorella, cilantro extract, distilled water, reverse osmosis water, charcoal
tablets and others are less toxic, but still damaging in various ways, and
should be avoided. The safest
agents are sulfur amino acids, garlic, modified citrus pectin, and the
alginates. While safer, these are
quite yin in Chinese medical terms and must be used sparingly, if at all.
4.
Removal is not thorough enough.
Most, if not all of the chelating agents only work in the blood and in
the tissues and organs located near larger blood vessels. Repeated use of the chelating agents
can go somewhat deeper, but then the hazards of chelation
such as removing more essential minerals also increase.
In contrast,
nutritional balancing science begins at the cellular level and works at this
level. The metals can slowly be
removed at much deeper levels, as a result, and much more thoroughly. Several patients of mine had previously
undergone 40 or more chelation treatments. This is usually considered enough to
rid the body of lead, mercury or other metals. However, when these patients went on a nutritional balancing
program, they began to eliminate significant amounts of these toxic metals that
supposedly had already been removed.
The only explanation I can think of is that deeper deposits were now
being removed that were not reached by the chelating agents.
5.
Chelation does not remove a dozen toxic metals very
well. Chelating agents are somewhat helpful to
remove mercury, lead, cadmium, arsenic, copper, iron, aluminum and perhaps a
few other toxic metals. However, they
will not remove well about a dozen other toxic metals for various reasons that
are not well understood. By
contrast, nutritional balancing science will remove all of the toxic metals,
along with hundreds of toxic chemicals as well.
6.
Chelation does not address some deeper causes of
illness, and indeed often makes body chemistry more unbalanced. While toxic metal removal is
helpful in some cases, many times the metal accumulation is due to many other
bodily imbalances. These include Yin Disease, Sympathetic
Dominance, mineral deficiencies, chronic infections, imbalanced mineral
ratios and more.
Nutritional
balancing approaches the problem of toxic metals from a different
perspective. First one balances
the body and renourishes the body. One also removes the need for adaptations to stress. Toxic metals often function as
adaptations to the stress of mineral deficiencies and other things.
When one
balances and renourishes the body in a particular
manner, the body automatically begins to remove the metals by itself. Our bodies have millions of years of
experience removing toxic metals, and the body can do this easily when it is
balanced and nourished properly.
When metal
removal is done this way, the toxic metals also will not tend to reaccumulate nearly as much, so less therapy is actually
required.
Also, the
process is much safer. The toxic
metals can actually perform a useful function to balance certain mineral
ratios. Just pulling them out can
be like pulling oneÕs finger out of a hole in a dike that was holding back the
water. This is why patients
sometimes have very bad reactions to chelation
therapy. Such reactions do not
occur as much with nutritional balancing science because the emphasis is on
balance and nourishment first.
7.
Stopping mental and spiritual development. One of the problems with bypass surgery is that the
anesthesia drugs from a long and complex surgery often cause permanent mental
impairment. However, the effects
of chelation therapy are even worse, in my
experience. The reason is that by
removing tiny amounts of certain forms of minerals such as zinc and selenium, chelation therapy easily stops the development of some of
the finer brain centers.
Unfortunately, these effects are difficult or even impossible to
reverse, in my experience to date.
When this
type of mental development is stopped or damaged, people report, for example,
that they feel less connected to God or the holy spirit. This can be devastating for them. Please consider this when tempted to
opt for chelation therapy instead of a nutritional
balancing program.
8.
Chelation removes toxic metals in an unnatural order.
In
nutritional balancing, all of the toxic metals are removed in the bodyÕs own
order. This is a complex and
delicate process. The practitioner
simply keeps balancing and supporting the overall stress response by balancing
the key mineral ratios and oxidation rate, and the body does the rest.
Chelation therapy is
more of a ÔsledgehammerÕ approach that literally rips the toxic metals out of
the enzyme binding sites in a totally unnatural order. This can cause problems, and, in fact,
it slows deeper healing of the body or may cause it to stop altogether.
In addition,
because the order is unnatural, some reaccumulation
of the toxic metals often occurs, necessitating more chelation
therapy in the future. It is also
possible that toxic metals that the body either cannot remove well enough or
that reaccumulate for other reason will end up in
more vital organs. This does not
occur with a properly designed nutritional balancing program.
9.
Cost and necessity. Intravenous chelation can be somewhat costly, although it is far
cheaper than bypass surgery, for example.
Neither one, however, are needed, in our experience, except perhaps in a
few cases discussed below.
10.
No matter what anyone claims, chelation therapy is an
allopathic, or drug approach to healing. By this I mean that it does not address underlying
imbalances, it is somewhat toxic, it never balances the body, and it usually
reduces the overall vitality of the body.
This is important
because naturopaths and holistic doctors claim to avoid allopathic approaches,
but often offer chelation. While it is a better alternative to bypass surgery, for
example, it is still very allopathic in its philosophy and methodology.
Granted, it
may extend life because it can remove calcium deposits from the arteries of the
heart, brain, liver and elsewhere.
However, this is not the same as improving overall vitality and health. As stated above, Dr. Paul Eck, my
mentor, found that chelation tends to lower the
sodium/potassium ratio, which always indicates impairment of overall vitality
and a decrease in the electrical charge on the cells. This is never helpful.
OTHER TOPICS RELATED TO CHELATION THERAPY
HOW
EFFECTIVE IS CHELATION THERAPY?
Heart
disease (arteriosclerosis).
Chelation therapy definitely removes some
toxic metals that lodge in the arteries.
This is one of its best uses.
By so doing, it can improve blood flow to the heart and other
organs. Over one thousand studies
confirm this.
However, chelation therapy for heart disease is not medically
accepted. The likely reason for
this is that it competes directly with heart bypass and other common surgeries
that are major sources of income - literally in the billions of dollars - for
physicians, hospitals, drug companies and others who sell or supply various
medical items.
The claim
that chelation is not well-researched, or that it is
more dangerous than most heart surgery, is false. The ignorance and deception by the medical journals and
authorities on this subject are a sad reflection upon a medical profession that
supposedly exists to help people, rather than to harm them or take their
money.
The
statistics on bypass surgery, for example, show clearly that there are many
side effects that would be prevented if nutritional balancing, chelation or other methods such as sauna therapy were tried
first. The cost of chelation and natural methods is often one tenth to one-one
hundredth of bypass surgery. Thus,
bypass surgery is quite insane today.
If chelation or other natural methods failed,
then surgery might be considered, but that is not the way heart disease is
treated today.
Chelation for other diseases such as dementia,
diabetes, impaired circulation, and others. Fewer studies support the benefits of chelation
therapy for other conditions, but it can be helpful to remove symptoms in some
cases because toxic metals cause so many ailments in modern day society.
Having
said this, chelation therapy is not a part of
nutritional balancing science, and never will be due to the reasons given
above. While safer
than open heart surgery, chelation is not safe at all
compared to nutritional balancing, and not as effective. In fact, nutritional balancing, in our
experience, can accomplish all that chelation does,
and can do it far better in every way.
HOW
I RECOMMEND REMOVING TOXIC METALS
Toxic metal
exposure is universal today.
Everyone has toxic metals.
To read why I say this, read Everyone Is
Toxic. All children are born
with some toxic metals that pass through the placenta from their mothers. This is why removing toxic metals with
a nutritional balancing program BEFORE one becomes pregnant is very critical if
one wishes to have healthy children.
It does not matter how beautiful a young woman looks, or even if her
blood or hair tests indicate that she does not have toxic metals. They are just hidden in these cases.
After birth,
vaccine exposure is an important source of mercury and aluminum, along with
food, drinking water, pharmaceutical drugs of many kinds, over-the-counter
drugs, cosmetics, and other environmental sources. These include, but are not limited to air pollution, dental
amalgams and other dental materials, and contact with toxic metals at home and
at work.
In
nutritional balancing work, we assume that everyone has toxic metals. I have yet to work with anyone who is
not quite toxic. Toxic metals are
not the most important assessment.
It is far more important to figure out a personÕs energy level, exact
oxidation rate, ability to eliminate toxic metals, ability to digest and
assimilate nutrients and a few other parameters of health.
Once this is
done, Dr. EckÕs system involves designing a healing program that includes at
least 20 methods to gently and safely remove ALL the toxic metals and ALL toxic
chemicals in the body at the same time.
They include improving the vitality level, balancing the autonomic
nervous system (see Understanding The
Autonomic Nervous System), improving the eliminative organs, the use of
antagonists and synergists and much more.
For the specifics of these methods, read Toxic
Metals And How To Remove Them on this site.
WHERE
DO SAUNAS AND COFFEE ENEMAS FIT IN FOR TOXIC METAL REMOVAL?
In my
experience, saunas are the finest single additional modality with a nutritional
balancing program for toxic metal elimination. They combine a number of effects that together produce
wonderful results. They are also safe
and very cost-effective. One can
build or buy a light sauna for several hundred dollars or less. Click here
for information about saunas.
In
essence, sauna therapy helps rejuvenate the skin, the largest eliminative organ
in the body. It helps decongest
the internal organs by shunting blood to the body surface. It helps to spare and protect the
kidneys, as most all toxins eliminated by the kidneys can be eliminated in the
sweat.
Heating the
body assists it to kill pathogenic microorganisms, and helps destroy weaker, toxic
metal-laden cells. Saunas also
drastically increase circulation, assisting to dislodge stored toxins and
assisting nutrients to reach all the cells to improve energy output.
The sauna is
also a powerful inhibitor of the sympathetic nervous system. According to Guyton's Textbook of Medical Physiology, when
heat is supplied from outside, normal heat production, a sympathetic activity,
shuts down. Also, shunting blood
to the body surface to remove heat requires and causes inhibition of the
sympathetic system.
Infrared
energy supplied by far infrared and infrared light saunas adds other benefits
such as deep tissue heating, decoupling of toxins from water molecules,
production of heat shock proteins that help regenerate cellular structures, and
more. Saunas also have a long
history of safety that extends over literally thousands of years..
For
all these reasons, saunas are the finest single modality for toxic metal
removal. As added benefits, they
are also the best methods I have found to remove toxic chemicals, another
serious health hazard. They are
also powerful infection-fighters, and able to dig out old chronic infections
that deplete one's energy and secrete biological toxins that are hidden causes
of systemic disease.
Coffee enemas. These are also superb for removing most
toxins from the liver and large intestine. They should be included in any detoxification protocol for
this reason. For more information
about this unusual but very helpful therapy that can be done in the privacy of
your home, read Coffee Enemas on this website.
A
TESTIMONIAL
One of our
clients, Rosemary G., asked that her experience with chelation
be included in this article.
Several years ago, at age 64, Rosemary was diagnosed with mercury
toxicity. Her symptoms included
extreme fatigue, a kind of free-floating fear, depression, anxiety, skin
problems, and other emotional disturbances.
She
underwent more than 20 chelation treatments to remove
the mercury, using DMPS and DMSA. She reported that the treatments did
not help her symptoms, but in fact made her more ill.
Her first
hair tissue mineral analysis revealed a 0.4 mg% mercury level. This is over 10 times normal. She had been told that her mercury
level was fine. After only three
months on a nutritional balancing program, Rosemary began to feel normal for
the first time in many years. A
retest hair mineral analysis showed an almost 100% increase in her hair mercury
level to 0.74 mg%. This indicates
an active elimination in progress.
Rosemary is continuing on her nutritional balancing program and feeling
still better, as there is more mercury yet to be eliminated.
Home | Hair Analysis | Saunas | Books | Articles
| Detox
Protocols
Courses | About
Dr. Wilson | Contact Us | The Free Basic Program