MAMMOGRAMS DO NOT REDUCE CANCER MORTALITY
All
information in this article is for educational purposes only. It is not for the diagnosis, treatment,
prescription or cure of any disease or health condition.
(Dr. WilsonÕs comments: This is an excellent article about mammograms by Dr. Mercola, so I have reprinted it in its entirety.)
Do annual mammograms save lives?
Several studies over the past few years have concluded that mammograms
do not save lives, and may actually harm more women than they help, courtesy of
false positives, overtreatment, and radiation-induced cancers.
According to research1 published in 2010, the reduction in mortality as a
result of mammographic screening was so small as to be nonexistent — a
mere 2.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years were spared.
Another study2 published in The
Lancet Oncology in 2011 demonstrated, for the first time, that women who
received the most breast screenings had a higher
cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer over the following six years
than the control group who received far less screenings.
Now, researchers from Harvard and Dartmouth have published a paper3 in which they present similar
conclusions.
Mammograms
Have No Impact on Breast Cancer Mortality
After analyzing cancer registry data from 16 million women in 547
counties across the United States, they found Òno evident correlation between
the extent of screening and 10-year breast cancer mortality.Ó
The researchers concluded that mammograms primarily find small,
typically harmless, or non-lethal tumors, leading to widespread overdiagnosis.
As explained by Dr. Otis Webb Brawley, chief medical officer of the
American Cancer Society and author of the book, How We Do Harm, the term "overdiagnosis" in cancer
medicine refers to:
"...a tumor that fulfills all
laboratory criteria to be called cancer but, if left alone, would never cause
harm. This is a tumor that will not continue to grow, spread, and kill. It is a
tumor that can be cured with treatment but does not need to be treated and/or
cured."
Also, echoing results found in 2011, higher screening rates were
associated with higher incidence of breast cancer. As reported by The LA Times:4
ÒFor every 10-percentage-point
increase in screening rates, the incidence of breast cancer rose by 16
percent... That worked out to an extra 35 to 49 breast cancer cases for every
100,000 women...
The researchers also examined breast
cancers according to their stage at diagnosis, a marker of a tumorÕs
aggressiveness. More screening was associated with a higher incidence of
early-stage breast cancers but no change for later-stage tumors, according to
the study.
How can this be?
ÔThe simplest explanation is
widespread overdiagnosis, which increases the incidence of small cancers
without changing mortality,Õ the study authors wrote. ÔEven where there are 1.8
times as many cancers being diagnosed, mortality is the same.ÕÓ
ideo on www.youtube.com</a>, or
enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser.</div></div>
To
Screen or Not to Screen?
Clearly, the issue of breast cancer screening using mammography can be a
deeply emotional one. Virtually all discussions relating to cancer are. A
recent article in Forbes Magazine5 paints a vivid picture of most
womenÕs fears, and warns of the dangers of not getting diagnosed in time.
While it needs to be an individual choice, I believe it can be valuable
to take a step back and look at the big picture, which includes
population-based statistics such as those presented above.
ItÕs also well worth investigating all available options and, of course,
weigh the risks and benefits associated with each. As reported by Care2:6
Ò[The] study authors... point to a
balance of benefits and harms and believe mammography is likely most favorable
when directed at women who are at high risk — not too rarely and not too
frequently.
They also believe watchful waiting,
rather than immediate active treatment, is probably a good option in some
cases.Ó
A main objection to mammography is the fact that it uses ionizing
radiation to take images of your breasts, and itÕs a well-established fact that
ionizing radiation can cause cancer.
So the idea that the ÒbestÓ way for you to avoid dying from cancer is to
expose yourself to cancer-promoting radiation at regular intervals for decades
on end (in order to catch the cancer early) really falls short on logic —
especially since there are non-ionizing radiation imaging techniques available.
Results published in the British
Medical Journal7 (BMJ) in 2012 show that women carrying a specific
gene mutation called BRCA1/2 are particularly
vulnerable to radiation-induced cancer.
Women carrying this mutation who were exposed to diagnostic radiation
before the age of 30 were twice as likely to develop breast cancer, compared to
those who did not have the mutated gene.
They also found that the radiation-induced cancer was dose-responsive,
meaning the greater the dose, the higher the risk of cancer developing. The
authors concluded that:
ÒThe results of this study support
the use of non-ionizing radiation imaging techniques (such as magnetic
resonance imaging) as the main tool for surveillance in young women with
BRCA1/2 mutations.Ó
Mammograms
Do Not Reduce Mortality Beyond That of
video on www.youtube.com</a>, or enable
JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser.</div></div>
Last year, one of the largest and longest investigations into
mammography was published.8
It involved 90,000 women who were followed for 25 years, and it sent
shockwaves through the medical industry when it reported that the death rates
from breast cancer were virtually identical among women who got annual
mammograms and those who did not.
Moreover, it found that mammography screening had harmful effects. As
reported by The New York Times:9
ÒOne in five cancers found with
mammography and treated was not a threat to the womanÕs health and did not need
treatment such as chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation.Ó
At the outset of the study, the women, aged 40-59, were randomly
assigned to receive either five annual mammography screens, or an annual
physical breast examination without mammography.Over the course of the study,
3,250 of the women who received mammography were diagnosed with breast cancer,
compared to 3,133 in the non-mammography group.
Of those, 500 women in the mammography group, and 505 in the control
group, died from the disease. However, after 15 years of follow-up, the
mammography group had another 106 extra cancer diagnoses, which were attributed
to overdiagnosis. According to the authors:10
ÒAnnual mammography in women aged
40-59 does not reduce mortality from breast cancer beyond that of physical
examination or usual care when adjuvant therapy for breast cancer is freely
available. Overall, 22 percent of screen detected invasive breast cancers were
over-diagnosed, representing one over-diagnosed breast cancer for every 424
women who received mammography screening in the trial.Ó
The rate of overdiagnosis (22 percent) is virtually identical to that
found in a 2012 Norwegian study,11 which found that as many as 25
percent of women are consistently overdiagnosed with breast cancer that, if
left alone, would cause no harm. Other studies that have come to similar
conclusions include the following:
¥
In 2007, the Archives of Internal
Medicine12 published a meta-analysis of 117 randomized, controlled mammogram
trials. Among its findings: rates of false-positive results are high (20-56
percent after 10 mammograms)
¥
A 2009 meta analysis by the Cochrane Database review13 found that breast cancer screening
led to a 30 percent rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which increasedthe
absolute risk of developing cancer by 0.5 percent. The review concluded
that for every 2,000 women invited for screening throughout a 10 year period,
the life of just ONE woman was prolonged, while 10 healthy women were underwent
unnecessary treatment.
Know
the Signs and Symptoms of Breast Cancer
Mammograms can also miss the presence of cancer. According to the
National Cancer Institute (NCI), mammograms miss up to 20 percent of breast
cancers present at the time of screening. Your risk for a false negative is
particularly great if you have dense breast tissue, and an estimated 49 percent
of women do.14 Mammography's sensitivity for dense breasts is as low as 27 percent,15 which means that about 75 percent of dense-breasted women are at
risk for a cancer being missed if they rely solely on mammography. Even
with digital mammography, the sensitivity is still less than 60 percent.
Considering the mortality rate from breast cancer is virtually identical
whether you get an annual mammogram or an annual physical breast exam, it
suggests physical examination can go a long way toward detecting a potential
cancer. It certainly makes sense to familiarize yourself with your breasts and
the signs and symptoms of breast cancer.16,17 If you notice any of the following symptoms, be
sure to address it with your doctor, even if youÕre not due for an annual
checkup yet.
Lump in the
breast (keep in mind that breast lumps are common, and most are not
cancerous) |
Dimpling of
the breast surface, and/or Òorange peelÓ skin texture |
Pain or
unusual tenderness or swelling in the breast |
Visible
veins on the breast |
Retracted
nipple |
Change in size
or shape of the breast |
Nipple
discharge |
Enlarged
lymph nodes (located in the armpit) |
Vaginal pain |
Unintentional
weight loss |
Optimize
Your Vitamin D for Breast Cancer Prevention
While detection and diagnosis of breast cancer is certainly important as
early treatment has a greater chance of success, prevention is really key, and here you can wield a lot of power
over your own destiny. In the largest review of research into lifestyle and breast
cancer, the American Institute of Cancer Research estimated that about 40
percent of US breast cancer cases could be prevented if people made wiser
lifestyle choices. I believe that is a very conservative estimate.
ItÕs likely that 75 percent to 90 percent of breast cancers could be
avoided by strictly applying the recommendations below, especially when done in
combination, as part of an overall healthy lifestyle. Optimizing your
vitamin D level alone has been shown to reduce your chances of breast cancer
by at least 50 percent and double your chances of surviving breast cancer
should you receive a breast cancer diagnosis.
Vitamin D
influences virtually every cell in your body and is one of nature's most potent
cancer fighters. ItÕs actually able to enter cancer cells and trigger apoptosis
(cell death). Vitamin D also works synergistically with every cancer treatment
I'm aware of, with no adverse effects. The average vitamin D level found in
American breast cancer patients18 is 17 ng/ml, a far cry from a more optimal 40-50
ng/ml.
So please, be sure to regularly monitor your vitamin D levels and take
whatever amount of vitamin D3 you need to maintain a clinically relevant level.
(Remember you also need vitamin K2
if youÕre taking an oral vitamin D supplement instead of getting regular sun
exposure.)
Other
Breast Cancer Prevention Tips
Other important lifestyle considerations that can help reduce your
chances of breast cancer include the following:
Eat REAL Food |
A key
dietary principle for optimal health and disease prevention is to eat real food. Choose fresh, organic,
preferably locally growth foods. That also means avoiding all types of
processed foods, which can contain any number of health harming ingredients,
from refined sugar, processed fructose, genetically engineered ingredients, carcinogenic
pesticides, and tens of thousands of food additives
that have not been tested for safety. Refined
sugar is detrimental to your health in general and promotes cancer. As a
general guideline, limit your total fructose intake to less than 25 grams
daily. If you have cancer or are insulin resistant, you would be wise to
restrict it to 15 grams or less. Consider
reducing your protein intake to one gram per kilogram of lean body weight.
Replace the eliminated protein and carbs with high-quality
fats, such as organic eggs from pastured hens, high-quality meats,
avocados, and coconut oil. There's compelling evidence that a ketogenic diet
helps prevent and treat many forms
of cancer. Also
consider adding more cancer-fighting foods, herbs, and spices to your diet,
such as broccoli. To learn more about how anti-angiogenetic foods fight
cancer, please see our previous article: ÒDramatically
Effective New Natural Way to Starve Cancer and Obesity.Ó |
Get plenty of natural vitamin A |
Vitamin A
may also play a role in helping prevent breast cancer.19 It's best
to obtain it from vitamin A-rich foods, rather than a supplement. Your best
sources are organic egg yolks, raw butter, raw whole milk, and beef or
chicken liver. Beware of
supplementing as there's some evidence that excessive vitamin A
can negate the benefits of vitamin D. Since appropriate vitamin D levels are
crucial for your health in general, not to mention cancer prevention, this
means that it's essential to have the
proper ratio of vitamin D to vitamin A in your body. Ideally,
you'll want to provide all the vitamin A and vitamin D substrate your body
needs in such a way that your body can regulate both systems naturally. This
is best done by eating colorful vegetables (for vitamin A) and by exposing
your skin to appropriate amounts sunshine every day (for vitamin D). |
Get sufficient amounts of iodine |
Iodine is an
essential trace element required for the synthesis of hormones, and the lack
of it can also cause or contribute to the development of a number of health
problems, including breast cancer. This is because your breasts absorb and
use a lot of iodine, which they need for proper cellular function. Iodine
deficiency or insufficiency in any of tissue will lead to dysfunction of that
tissue, and tumors are one possibility. However,
there's significant controversy over the appropriate dosage, so you need to
use caution here. There's evidence indicating that taking mega-doses, in the
tens of milligram range may be counterproductive. One recent study suggests
it might not be wise to get more than about 800 mcg of iodine per day, and
supplementing with as much as 12-13 mg (12,000-13,000 mcgs) could potentially
have some adverse health effects. |
Nourish your gut |
Optimizing
your gut flora
will reduce inflammation and strengthen your immune response. Researchers
have found a microbe-dependent mechanism through which some cancers mount an
inflammatory response that fuels their development and growth. They suggest
inhibiting inflammatory cytokines might slow cancer progression and improve
the response to chemotherapy. Adding naturally
fermented food to your daily diet is an easy way to prevent cancer
or speed recovery. You can always add a high-quality probiotic supplement as
well, but naturally fermented foods are the best. |
Avoid xenoestrogens |
Xenoestrogens
are synthetic chemicals that mimic natural estrogens. They have been linked
to a wide range of human health effects, including reduced sperm counts in
men and increased risk of breast cancer in women. There are a large number of
xenoestrogens, such as bovine growth hormones in commercial dairy, plastics
like bisphenol-A (BPA), phthalates, and parabens in personal care products,
and chemicals used in non-stick materials, just to name a few. |
Avoid charring your meats |
Charcoal or
flame broiled meat is linked with increased breast cancer risk. Acrylamide
— a carcinogen created when starchy foods are baked, roasted, or fried
— has been found to increase breast cancer risk as well. |
Avoid unfermented soy products |
Unfermented soy
is high in plant estrogens, or phytoestrogens, also known as isoflavones. In
some studies, soy appears to work in concert with human estrogen to increase
breast cell proliferation, which increases the chances for mutations and
cancerous cells. |
|
|
Get plenty of high quality animal-based omega-3
fats |
Omega-3 deficiency is a common
underlying factor for cancer. |
Take curcumin |
This is the active
ingredient in turmeric and in high concentrations can be very useful in the
treatment of breast cancer. It shows immense therapeutic potential in
preventing breast cancer metastasis.20 To learn
more about its use for the prevention of cancer, please see my interview with
Dr. William LaValley. |
Avoid drinking alcohol |
Or at least
limit your alcoholic drinks to one per day. |
Improve your insulin and leptin receptor
sensitivity |
Eating a
whole food diet low in added sugars is key. Exercising regularly will also
promote optimal insulin and leptin sensitivity |
Avoid wearing underwire bras |
There is
intriguing data suggesting metal underwire bras
increase your breast cancer risk. |
Avoid electromagnetic fields |
Items such
as electric
blankets and cell phones can be particularly troublesome and
increase your cancer risk. Definitely avoid stashing your phone in your
bra as you go about your day. |
Home | Hair Analysis | Saunas | Books | Articles | Detox Protocols
Courses
| About Dr. Wilson | The Free Basic
Program