LOBBYISTÕS REPORT
By Charles Frohman
Stop
the Wireless Mesh
TelecomÕs
Antennas Will Trap Us in a Digital Gulag
Politicians
are risking loss of the grassroots support that they gained from their having
provided critical protection for their constituents from the corrupt COVID-19
mandates. This is because the ÒWireless MeshÓ enabled by their bills replace
one threat to informed consent with another. We must defeat the flood of
Wireless bills coasting through Congress, demand that
States respect utility meter opt-out
rights, and instead make the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) obey the
Court order to base its radiofrequency electromagnetic exposure
guidelines on 11,000 pages of court-accepted scientific evidence of biological
harm to humans and the environment.
1. Telecom
Malfeasance against Preferred Fiber. By now, every American should
already have broadband via fiber, paid for by taxes on our telephone bills.
Polls show that consumers prefer fiber by two
thirds. This money, however, was illegally diverted by Telecom to their wireless schemes to monetize data and
profit via planned obsolescence. It may be cheaper in the short run to connect
some rural homes via antennas, but the 50-year lifespan of a fiber cable will save
more money overall than a 5-year-lasting antenna or
the obsolescence requiring constant phone upgrades and equipment repairs.
Wireless will only exacerbate the so-called broadband digital divide between
those who are connected and those who are not.
2. Hurts
Property Values. Property owners do not want to suffer
takings of their property via lowered property values from nearby wireless
antennas to which they never consented. Over 90% of surveyed Americans
do not want wireless technology near their homes, while realtors are upset that
these harmful and unsightly cell towers reduce
home values by over 20%.
3. Hiding
the Danger. Among the wireless dangers accepted by
American courts, a 2018 study from the National Toxicology Program (NTP) found
"clear
evidence" of DNA damage and cancer, making it
suspicious that in 1996 Congress defunded any
long-term radiation exposure studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). In 2012, the GAO complained of lax FCC
exposure guidelines, and the NTP just announced that it would no longer study
radiation dangers. Is Telecom smothering the science just as Pharma continues
to hide excess
injuries stemming from its COVID-19 injections and
other recent pandemic measures?
4. Uncompensated
Taking. While the health-freedom grassroots movement
appreciates those politicians who protected them against tyrannical COVID-19
mandates, they will not
forgive elected officials who deny the people informed consent when it
comes to broadband connectivity. For example, if you were to suffer radiation
pollution, that is, physical harm, on your property from a neighbor's
"OTARD" (Over-The-Air Reception Devices) roof antenna, or from
Verizon's small cell tower on your corner street pole, then you are suffering
an uncompensated 5th amendment taking of your health (which evidence the D.C.
Federal Appeals court has accepted) and of your property (previous studies have
shown cell towers reducing home values by over
20%). Telecom's unwanted wireless mesh threatens fundamental informed consent
and is an unconstitutional taking of property.
5. Depresses
Farm Yields. Not only is Big Telecom trying to
preempt local zoning protections for property owners (HR 3557), but also the
House has passed HR 1339 to replace traditional farming with microwave
ecology that will depress milk and crop yields, make soil sterile, and reduce
fertility rates in farm animals to as low as 50%. We already know too many
farmers are endangering food consumers via their acceptance of RNA-modifying
livestock vaccines, harmful vet drugs such
as zilpaterol, and GMO
pesticides, versus sustainable, regenerative
farming. Synergizing these dangerous behaviors with the wireless mesh will
exacerbate the real epidemic, namely chronic disease. The
microwave ecology will also be hackable by our adversaries, as admitted by
former FCC Commissioner Wheeler when he stated that 5G is inherently
insecure.
6. Ruining
National Parks. Another bill, passed in Natural
Resources, is HR 6492. It would exacerbate the known fire risk of cell
towers by carpeting our public lands with antennas that are neither needed nor wanted.
They are unneeded because any hiker with an iPhone can now use satellites to
call 911, and they are unwanted because patrons of our parks actually go there
to escape the
digitalization.
7. Promoting
Corporate Welfare. Politicians complain about Big Telecom
subsidies but fail to understand that there is no way those will ever disappear
if we subsidize wireless in preference to fiber. That's because wireless has
built-in obsolescence, forcing consumers to upgrade phones and requiring
constant repairs of equipment. On the other hand, once fiber is buried or hung,
such cables can last half a century. To get fiber to every premise, let States
and markets negotiate and settle upon the best solutions only reachable
locally, as envisioned in the Irregulators
Lawsuit.
8. Unwanted
Digital Gulag. Politicians are making a
GRAVE mistake by allowing Big Telecom to pass its bills to
replace safe, reliable, energy-efficient, secure, and fast fiber with unhealthy,
unsafe, unreliable, energy-inefficient, insecure, and slow wireless. If we wake
to a dangerous, ugly forest of antennas outside our bedrooms, classrooms,
offices, and nearby parks, we will look to see who silently stood by while
Telecom unleashed this unwanted harm to our health, property, and the
environment. Moreover, the World Health Organization (WHO) is on the verge of preempting
sovereign public-health responses by WHOÕs
member nations, with coercive measures to be used against those people thinking
independently of the ÒnarrativeÓ gatekeepers. This coercion will happen via
mass surveillance on the wireless mesh, making an outright digital gulag among
the array of antennas, routers, smart meters, and devices. Big
Brother, anyone?
Please
oppose Big TelecomÕs legislation that will force Americans to accept harmful
wireless instead of safe fiber. Guarantee in each State a right to opt out of
wireless utility meters, and make the FCC update its wireless exposure
guidelines that respect the courtÕs order to account for the thousands of pages
of scientific evidence of biological harm to humans and the environment.
Just a quick note that if you struggle with the
zip code finder at the bottom of this page, just copy the entire text, find your
U.S. Rep and both Senators, go to their websites and
paste into an email to all 3 politicians.
Once finished, please go to NHF's
campaign page and send an email on another
Health Freedom topic. The more the politicians hear from us, the less
excuse they'll have to ignore important threats to health and liberty!