THE THEORY OF NUTRITIONAL
BALANCING SCIENCE
by Lawrence Wilson, MD
© Revised, July 208, The Center For Development
This article originally appeared in the Healthscope Magazine,
1981, published by the Eck Institute of Applied Nutrition and Bioenergetics, Ltd. It has been expanded.
Many
important scientific breakthroughs occur in the gray area between traditional
sciences. Such is the case with
nutritional balancing science.
Incorporating
knowledge from the fields of biochemistry, physiology, nutrition, stress
theory, pathology and psychology, this science is a synthesis that draws
together many ideas. It also
clarifies previously unexplained phenomena and presents a new and expanded
approach to healing.
It
involves a precise means of assessing and monitoring the condition of the body
chemistry. It also includes a new
set of rules for interpreting hair mineral test results. Finally, it offers specific
applications of diet, supplementary nutrients, detoxification protocols, mental
and emotional suggestions and more to raise oneÕs energy level and restore a
more balanced chemistry.
THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF
NUTRITIONAL BALANCING
Nutritional
balancing draws from many branches of science, as mentioned above. However, its essence is based on a set
of little known and poorly understood concepts elaborated only within the past
80 years.
To
appreciate the research that has gone into the development of nutritional
balancing science, at least some familiarity with these concepts is helpful. They
Include:
1. General Systems Theory.
2. Cybernetics, the science of communication and control in
complex self-regulating systems.
3. The General Adaptation Syndrome and Stress Theory of Disease.
4. Bioenergetics
or Vitality.
5. The Concept of Preferred Minerals.
6. Biochemical Individuality.
7. Metabolic Typing.
8. Orthomolecular Medicine.
9. The Mineral Balancing System.
10. Wellness.
11. Biological Transmutation of
the Elements.
12. Predictive Medicine.
13. Restorative and Functional
Medicine.
14. Holism.
15. Hair Mineral Analysis by
spectroscopy.
Here are
more details about each of these principles.
GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY
Definition. A system is a group of items, all of which affect each
other. While not a rigorous definition, it adequate for our
purpose.
In the
early 20th century, great minds realized the importance of viewing
many complex phenomena as ÒsystemsÓ.
Among the pioneers was Ludwig Von Bertalanffy, author of General
System Theory, Foundations, Development and Applications (1968).
While we
take the word ÔsystemÕ for granted, today, it is a relatively new word in
common parlance. Understanding the
laws of systems, however, is essential to understanding nutritional balancing
science.
Conventional
allopathic medicine, by contrast, and even most nutrition science, often still
thinks in terms of body parts and individual functions much more than in terms
of the entire human system.
Facts
About Systems. We will only discuss a few essential properties and facts
about systems in this article. One
of these is that systems are of different types.
Open
systems are those in which the boundaries
and all the parts are not known. A
prime example is our universe. We
donÕt know how big it is, really, so we donÕt know its boundaries. Also, we donÕt know much about many of
its features or parts.
Open
systems are exciting on a theoretical level, but very difficult to work
with. We know so little about our
universe, for example, or on a smaller scale, the human brain, that exploring
it carefully is difficult at best.
Open
systems, you might say, are hard to get our minds around at all. However, the definition is important
because humans are open systems to a degree as well. The more spiritually developed a person is, the more he or
she is not ruled by the whims of the body. This is the open nature of human beings. However, for the most part, humans are
considered closed systems.
Closed
systems are those in which all or most of
the parts are understood and often facts are clear about the boundaries of the
system as well. Thus, living
organisms are generally considered closed systems under this definition. Closed systems are much easier to
study and analyze, which is fortunate for us.
Self-regulating
systems. These are systems that have so much feedback in them that
they can self-correct to maintain equilibrium or homeostasis.
Our
bodies definitely are members of this group of systems, as are animals and even
plants to some degree.
Systemic
events. These are events within a system that affect the entire
system or most of it, at least. An
example is the big bang that created an entire universe. For a person, a systemic event is going
to sleep or catching pneumonia.
Primarily
Local events. These are events within a system that have much less effect
o the entire system. An example
would be the effect on the entire universe of the birth of a baby somewhere on
planet earth. In a human body, a
local event might be a slight rise in temperature due to going outside on a
warm day.
Systems
always have both types of events at all times. It is important to realize this and be able to distinguish
primarily local from more important systemic events.
Laws
of systems. Dr. Von Bertalanffy and other pioneers of systems theory
discovered basic laws of all systems.
We will focus on laws related more to health and healing in this article:
1. The
behavior of the whole is more than the sum of its parts. This can also be stated that the whole
is greater than the sum of its parts.
This is
the hardest one for medical doctors and most people to appreciate. Our education system, including medical
schools, fail to teach it. But it
is true, nevertheless and needs to be taught widely.
It kicks
in, for example, when silly human beings think they understand something large
like the environment or a human being just because they understand parts of the
system. They wrongly believe they
know everything about the system, which they do not.
The
Soviet Union and Nazi Germany are examples on a governmental level. They decided that by controlling
everyone and killing those who would not go along, everything would work in
their favor. Instead, they
self-destructed, with our help, or course. They lost out to another systems principle, the one that
follows.
Thus,
parts of a system can be money, power, guns and so forth or parts can mean the
liver, kidneys, spleen and the rest.
The principle is the same in any case.
2. One
cannot predict the behavior of the whole from just knowing the parts. (This
follows from principle #1 above). This means that our world, which is a
system, is inherently unpredictable.
It is
actually a great spiritual truth that is found in different words in the bible
and every spiritual teaching, in fact.
It may be stated that God is in charge, or Allah is in charge, not us
puny humans. Smart people figured
out this principle thousands of years ago. However, it, too, is seldom mentioned in the schools.
In the
healing field, this principle implies that just knowing everything about the
stomach will not tell you about the whole person. Neither will full body scans of all the parts. It just doesnÕt work that way.
Inventing
new scanners and other tests is great, but it still will never explain a whole
human being.
This is
not bad or good. It is just the
truth about many aspects of complex, self-regulating systems.
General
applications of this principle. It is worth mentioning how systems
principles apply elsewhere. In
business, this fact is called Òthe unseen hand of the marketÓ. The most brilliant financial minds will
tell you they are sometimes wrong.
Government planners are wrong very often for this reason and are so
arrogant they refuse to admit it most of the time.
In the
environmental movement and weather prediction, it is called Òthe
unpredictability of mother natureÓ.
Medicine,
in its arrogance, mainly, gives it an esoteric Latin word, calling the unknown
and unpredictable ÒidiopathicÓ, ÒessentialÓ or using other terms as well for
common conditions including hypertension.
They mean, in simple English, we just donÕt know the cause.
However,
instead of adopting system behaviors, they continue to deal mainly in parts
only. This is why their success
with systemic illnesses is limited.
Local
and systemic events. Having said this, of course, an x-ray
of a broken leg will help a doctor set the led properly. This is because a broken leg is, in
systems terms, mainly a local event.
It does not, hopefully, affect the entire person. If it did, it would be a different kind
of event, in systems terms. Since
it is not, it can be dealt with locally.
Thus one
key to working with a person as a system is to know when an event is local and
when it is systemic. Admitedly,
this is not always easy. Modern
medicine has made great strides in this area, however, which is why emergency
medicine saves many lives every year.
Other
areas of medicine, however, continue to confuse these two types of events
often. Local events, like a broken
leg, are treated systemically with drugs that are not needed and are
toxic. Systemic events like cancer
and heart disease are treated locally, with poor results in many cases.
Principle
3. If one knows some behaviors of the whole, one can often predict behaviors of
the parts. This is a critical principle of systems.
If one
knows, for example, that human beings need eight or nine hours of sleep
nightly, then one will know that if one does not get the rest one needs, the
brain will not function correctly, the muscles may be weaker the next day and
so forth.
The point
is that by focusing on whole system behaviors, we can learn a lot about the
behavior of the parts of the human system.
This
brings up the question of what are some whole system behaviors of human
beings. An obvious answer is in
what is called lifestyle. This
includes oneÕs rest and sleep habits, diet, exercise and activity patterns and
others. Social interaction
patterns are others, thinking and attitudes are others. By knowing these, we ca predict a lot
about the behaviors of various parts of the human system.
I am
continually amazed that most medical doctors and even some naturopathic doctors
donÕt ask about these simple whole system behaviors. They could learn so much, so fast about a person and his or
her likely health conditions.
Principle
4. If one knows some of the behaviors of the whole system and most of the
parts, one can infer or learn the behaviors of the rest of the system.
This may
be the most critical systems principle of all. It is the method used in
nutritional balancing, acupuncture and other system sciences of healing.
In short,
the behavior of the whole human being that is most important is living versus
dying. The kidney is important,
the brain is very important, but if the patient dies, then those are useless.
So we
must ask, what are the next most important behaviors of the whole system do we
or can we know about? Obviously
there are many. We have mentioned
some basic ones, such as the personÕs diet, liestyle, rest level and many more
like this.
What
about others? This is where
nutritional balancing excels. Dr.
Paul Eck realized, perhaps unconsciously, that to fine-tune a healing program
he needed whole system behaviors.
The ones he found are called the metabolic or oxidation rate and type,
the stage of stress and the levels and ratios between various minerals in the
body.
There are
a million others, such as the blood sugar level, the blood pressure and
more. However, this brings us to
another principle of systems.
5.
Systems have various degrees of local and systemic or whole system behaviors
and events. Fatigue, for example, is a systemic event because it will
affect all parts of a personÕs life eventually. A broken finger is much more local because it rarely affects
the whole person that much, though it could if it becomes infected. If the infection spreads to the whole
body, it is definitely no longer a local event.
These may
sound very theoretical, but as you will see, we use them with our system of
nutritional balancing. Basically,
we figure out whole behaviors of the body such as metabolic type,
transmutations and others and then we can figure out how to proceed simply,
powerfully and safely to alter specific behaviors such as blood sugar, blood
pressure, inflammation and many others.
Systems
principles explain seeming paradoxes. For
example, in some nutritional balancing regimens, minerals that read high on the
hair test are supplemented.
Meanwhile, minerals that are low are left alone.
Sometimes
the patient is made to feel worse, such as with a four lows pattern on a hair
analysis. The person is already tired
and we give more calcium and magnesium and zinc, which tend to make one feel
tired. Meanwhile, foods and
supplements that give a sense of well-being are to be avoided. This is also the case with the four
lows pattern, for example.
A mineral
level or ratio that appears at first glance to be alarmingly abnormal, may be
considered evidence of positive progress.
Meanwhile, normal looking levels may indicate serious imbalances.
It all
depends on what is going on in the entire chart.
To repeat the principle, only by
starting with the behavior the whole system, can the behavior of the parts be
correctly interpreted.
Implications. Systems
theory has tremendous implications.
I will only give a few simple ones. Our entire lives are a system. We therefore ought to look at every aspect of life and make
sure that they are integrated.
These include oneÕs job, relationships, health program, lifestyle,
attitudes, emotional control and spiritual outlook.
Many
people have focused on just a few of these, but the rest are out of balance,
causing unhappiness and ill health.
Another implication
is the body must be approached as a system. This means not just looking at a stomach problem in the
stomach, but considering structural, nutritional, electrical, emotional and
other aspects simultaneously for the best results.
A final implication
is that any therapy must be viewed systemically, meaning to ask what the
effects are on the whole person, not just a symptom. For example, an antibiotic is very effective against certain
bacteria. However, it has negative
consequences for the intestinal flora, often, and at times for the liver and
other organs.
Therefore,
from a systems point of view, it is much less helpful than an alternative such
as colloidal silver that has many fewer negative systemic effects, also called
side effects.
CYBERNETICS
Definition. Cybernetics, which many equate with
computer science, is a study of complex, self-regulating systems. It is sometimes
called the science of communication and control in animal and machine.
It is the
brilliant work of Dr. Norbert Weiner at MIT and others who lived in the
mid-twentieth century in America.
Dr. Weinger wrote about it in two popular books, Cybernetics, or
Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (1948) and The Human Use of Human Beings (1950). He
and many others also wrote innumerable technical papers about it.
It began
as a way to program automatic tracking systems for machine guns on warships
during the second World War.
However, it applies to all self-regulating systems including computers,
robotics and, of course, human beings.
It
focuses not on things as much as on the relationships between unstable things
or parts of complex systems and their communication links.
We will
only touch on it because of it s immense complexity. However, we derive some important language form
cybernetics. The words homeostasis
and feed back loops are these important terms.
1.
Homeostasis is the process of maintaining internal system equilibrium or
balance in the face of dynamic or constantly changing outer conditions.
In the
case of a radar-controlled self-tracking machine gun on a destroyer, the outer
changing conditions are the ship rolling on the sea and the plane that is the
target flying by overhead. The gun
must stay trained on the plane in spite of these conditions.
In the case of the body, the outer
conditions include changes in temperature, for example, that require the body
to heat itself up or cool itself down all the time.
In fact,
there are thousands of changing conditions around any physical organism, from
invasions of germs to accidents, wounds, hunger, thirst and more. Throughout the body must keep itself
balanced or in homeostasis.
In fact,
homeostasis is about the most fundamental processes of life, even if the word
was coined to describe a war machine.
2.
Feedback loops are the special communication links needed to maintain
homeostasis. Feedback loops, additionally, can be of two major types.
Negative
feedback loops. Negative loops are those
that cause a return toward balance or toward the way things were before the
element in question was disturbed or changed.
Therefore,
negative feedback loops tend to move any system toward stability, balance and
in the case of our bodies, toward a return to excellent health.
For
example, if one does not sleep enough on a given night, the body will signal us
with fatigue to sleep more to return the body to a rested state of
balance. Fatigue acts as a
negative feedback mechanism, in other words, that helps us return to stability
and balance or health.
Positive
feedback loops cause an element in a
complex system that is disturbed to become more disturbed or further away from
balance. This means that positive
loops destabilize and are sometimes called 'vicious cycles'. If allowed to continue for any length
of time, they tend to destroy oneÕs health.
Serious
illness, for example, is generally caused by positive feedback loops. For example, let us discuss a heart
attack.
A heart
attack often starts with a mild blockage or mild spasm of a coronary artery
that restricts blood flow to a small area of the heart. However, this can cause intense chest
pain and discomfort.
The body
responds with a surge of adrenalin that unfortunately constricts the coronary
arteries further. This further restricts blood flow and causes more pain. If too little blood reaches the heart
muscle, it begins to die.
If the
situation is not reversed at once, the vicious cycle kills the person instantly
for practical purposes.
Not all
heart attacks kill because the positive feedback loop is broken somehow,
perhaps by the person becoming unconscious and relaxing or by an injection of
magnesium sulfate in the emergency room, or because the body can compensate for
the infracted or dead heart tissue enough that the heart continues to beat and
maintain life.
One could
view life and death as a battle between negative feedback loops trying to keep
us in balance and positive loops that kill.
A
nutritional example. When a person has low calcium and
magnesium, he feels irritable and anxious. By a positive loop, those feelings cause adrenal stimulation
that causes calcium and magnesium to go even lower.
This is a
vicious cycle that eventually results in an altered state of body chemistry
called fast oxidation.
However,
if one eats a food with calcium and magnesium which one may crave due to a
negative feedback loop, it reverses the positive loop or vicious cycle and the
person calms down and adrenal activity lessens.
In this
way, all of life is a series of communications and feedback loops that must
operate correctly or life ends rather quickly. This is the importance of cybernetic thinking and our
healing.
Life
is a series of homeostatic states. Life is just a series of homeostatic
states as our bodies respond or adapt to stress. The early stages of homeostasis are much healthier ones
characterized by better vitality and more ability to respond to stress. As one ages, homeostasis is harder to
maintain and the body begins to develop more problems.
Disease
a failure of homeostasis. Disease and death occur when the
homeostatic or balancing mechanisms no longer maintain the body. Then breakdowns begin occur that can
end in total shutdown or death..
The
goal of nutritional balancing, in the
broadest sense, is to assist the body to break out of positive feedback loops
and restore functioning of the negative loops. That, in turn, will move the body
back toward a more optimum or ideal condition of homeostasis.
THE GENERAL ADAPTATION SYNDROME
or G.A.S.
Definitions. The General Adaptation Syndrome or GAS
is a unified concept about how our bodies respond to stress. It is closely related to and part of the
stress theory of disease.
Stress is a general term for the process by which organisms face
changes in their environment which force the organism to alter itself in
thousands of ways in response.
Stressors are factors that impinges on an organism forcing that
organism to adapt or change itself in order to survive and thrive in their
environment.
Adaptation is the process whereby a complex self-regulating system or
organism responds to its environment to maintain homeostasis.
Adaptations are the changes that an organism makes in thousands of
parameters in order to compensate or cope with the effects of stress.
Credit
for this theory of disease goes directly to Dr. Hans Selye, MD. He first presented the theory in the
1950s and wrote a number of books about it such as The Stress of Life,
Stress Without Distress and Calciphylaxis. He was quite
a genius and receives little credit for his unified theory of disease in
animals and human beings.
Dr. Selye
found that experimental animals, when subjected to repeated shock treatment and
other stressful situations, responded in specific, predictable ways. Dr. Selye called the responses the
stages of stress. These he named the alarm,
resistance, and exhaustion stages.
Each
stage of stress is a lower energy and less desirable than the previous one and
each represents the best the animal can do to maintain itself under conditions
of increasing or continuing stress.
Stress. Dr. SelyeÕs
theory is the first ever unified concept of disease. It showed that many symptoms or diseases can be linked to
one single factor that he called stress.
While the
entire world has incorporated this word into its daily vocabulary, very few
people understand exactly what stress is or how it works. Hair analysis can change all that and
provide tremendous insight into human and animal functioning as a result.
Examples
of Adaptation. For example, when it is too hot outside, we sweat to lower
our body temperature. When it is
too cold outside, we shiver to warm up. When a bacteria invades the body, we often feel tired so we
will rest. Also, we may run a fever to help kill off the invading germs faster.
Each
adaptation, such as sweating, is actually a very complicated process all by
itself. Sweating, for example, is
governed by many feedback loops and systems so that, for example, we donÕt
sweat out all of our water and minerals and so that we stop sweating when the
body temperature returns to normal.
Many
factors can send a person into a lower energy stage of stress or less healthful
homeostatic state. These include
nutritional depletion, accumulation of toxic chemicals and toxic metals,
structural and other imbalances in the body.
This
process is reflected in our symptoms and even our mental attitudes such as depression,
anxiety and others. The
relationships between the stage of stress, oxidation types and personality is
covered in an articles entitled Personality And Hair
Mineral Analysis.
This idea
of viewing people as being in a stage of stress, also called the oxidation
type, is a key to learning nutritional balancing science and hair analysis
interpretation. It makes it much
more simple and orderly.
Importance
of the adrenal glands. The G.A.S. begins as a response of the
central nervous system. This, in
turn, affects the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.
The
sympathetic system affects certain glands, principally the adrenal medulla and
adrenal cortex to some degree, and the thyroid gland. This is why Dr. Paul Eck became so interested in these
glands and their effects on our health.
The
goal is a healthier stage of stress. The goal of nutritional balancing, in
broad terms, is to move an organism away from the stage of exhaustion and back
toward the more desirable stages of stress.
An even
more desirable outcome is a balanced or flexible state in which the organism is
not required to adapt very much at all. This is optimum homeostasis and is
really what spiritual development involves.
BIOENERGETICS OR VITALITY
Definition. Vitality or bio-energy is a mysterious
life force or energy that is enhanced or depleted in all life forms by various
foods, activities and by time.
This is
another basic concept about life, in general. It has been given many names throughout the ages such as
chi, qi, prana, orgone energy, adaptive energy, life force and others. Here are a few basic principles of
vitality.
1.
Life force or adaptive energy is central to health. It is the
common denominator of health. This
energy is required for all body functions. Therefore, any ailment or symptom can occur due to fatigue
or low vitality. This is the most
important implication of the vitality principle.
2. Energy is enhanced when the body does
not have to adapt. All adaptation uses up energy that
could otherwise be used for other things.
This
means that adapting to cold, heat, noise, infection, lack of rest, improper
food or other stress of any kind is not helpful for oneÕs health.
An
exception is that some temporary stress due to exercise or activity is good for
building the bones and muscles, but not for much else. This, and nothing else, should be the
function of exercise of activity.
Excessive
exercise does not build vitality. All other activity that produces excessive
stress, such as vigorous exercise done to exhaustion, is ultimately not helpful
for oneÕs health.
This is
very different from other systems of healing that encourage a lot of exercise,
for example.
Similarly,
any activity that depletes energy is not helpful. Even too much thinking is not helpful for health, although
some thinking is essential, of course. Thinking is a very calorie intensive
activity. The point is that people
who work too hard may endanger their health.
3.
Vitality is not the same as Òbeing energeticÓ. Many people
zoom around all day and even part of the night. However, on hair mineral tests we find that many of them do
not have a high vitality level, which we measure using various ratios mentioned
below.
Many
so-called vital people live on stimulants, for example, such as coffee or other
caffeinated foods or drinks. It is
important to realize that vitality is not the same as being energetic, which is
often just being stimulated.
Many
things can stimulate a person, such as anger, fear, sexual drive, music on their
radio, various foods such as sugars, drugs such as ADD drugs and more.
4. Vitality
is not so easy to measure. The
section above illustrates that a person who seems vital or energetic may not
be, while a person who is tired may be quite so. This is a confusing topic that is discussed more in the
article entitled Vitality on this website.
Building
Vitality. The importance of building adaptive energy or vitality in
the body in order to restore and maintain health is a central concept in
nutritional balancing science. We
do it by balancing the oxidation rate and renourishing the body.
Lifestyle
modifications also play a central role for some people. These include getting enough rest,
proper activity, early to bed and more.
Detoxification
is central for most people today, as the presence of toxic metals and chemicals
require that the body adapt to them in order to continue to function.
Reducing
medication and other toxic exposures is also important for many people,
although essential medication is important not to discontinue until it is
hopefully no longer needed such as blood pressure medication of insulin for a person
with diabetes.
Attitude
change is also important to build vitality. Negative thinking, depressive thinking and similar attitudes
can destroy oneÕs vitality quickly in some cases. This is why we always recommend the Roy Masters meditation
and other methods to build self-confidence and a positive outook.
THE CONCEPT OF PREFERRED MINERALS
Definition.
Thousands of enzymes in our bodies require specific minerals for their activity
or functioning. However, if the
ideal or preferred mineral is not available to the body, another mineral can usually
be substituted in the enzyme.
This is
in part a physics principle.
Cadmium, for example, has a molecular shape similar to zinc. Lead has a molecular shape and other
properties similar to calcium.
Because of these properties, cadmium can substitute for zinc in certain
key enzymes in our bodies. Lead
can substitute for calcium as well.
Sometimes,
several minerals can substitute for a preferred mineral. For example, zinc is the preferred
mineral in over one hundred critical enzymes in our bodies. If it is not present in sufficient
quantity, or becomes depleted due to stress, for example, the body can
substitute mercury, cadmium, arsenic and possibly others for it. Of course, they do not work as well,
but the body can continue to function at a lower level of efficiency.
An
adaptive mechanism to preserve life. The purpose of the substitution is to
allow life to continue in the face of nutritional deficiencies. Thus it is an adaptive mechanism.
As a
rule, the affected enzyme will perform its job far less efficiently with the
substitute mineral than it would if the ideal or preferred mineral were present
in the enzyme binding site. Thus
mineral substitution is always a bad thing, relatively, and leads to every disease
condition imaginable.
A Car
analogy. A simple analogy occurs if one is stuck out in the desert
and the car fan belt breaks. One might
try taking off oneÕs clothing belt and putting it in place of the correct part.
It may well keep the car going,
but is usually far less efficient and leads to breakdown if not replaced with
the correct part.
When too
many preferred minerals have been replaced by substitutes the enzyme efficiency
of the body becomes so low that life is not sustainable. Then cancer and very serious problems
occur.
This is
like having too many replacement parts in the car that are not the right
parts. When this happens in our
bodies, overall vitality declines and illness and death ensue.
Aging
and preferred minerals. The scenario above is what always
occurs with age. As nutritional
deficiencies develop and mineral substitution goes on for years, the body
eventually ages and dies.
Nutritional
balancing restores preferred minerals. One way to understand nutritional
balancing and some other natural healing approaches is that they aim to remove
less preferred minerals. Toxic
metals such as lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury are to be replaced with vital
or preferred minerals in thousands of enzyme binding sites and other locations
in the body.
This will
slowly restore the original efficiency of the enzymes and tissues and health improves
automatically and often dramatically.
Illnesses, depression, cancer and more just melt away, without any
attempt to Òtreat the diseaseÓ.
This is a
very powerful way to understand healing of many types. Nutritional balancing uses very
specific methods to help support the body while the toxic metal is being
eliminated so that the replacement process occurs smoothly, rapidly and
safely. For this reason, it tends
to be far safer than, for example, random chelation with drugs or even with
natural chelating agents.
Instead
of just using one method to remove toxic metals, for instance chelation, nutritional
balancing relies on at least eight methods used together at the same time to
remove and replace toxic metals with preferred minerals. These methods are discussed in detail
in an article on this website entitled Toxic
Metals.
BIOCHEMICAL INDIVIDUALITY
Definition. Biochemical Individuality is the
concept that all bodies have different nutritional and other needs. These depend
on oneÕs age, lifestyle, health condition and many other factors.
This very
important nutritional principle was put forth by Dr. Roger Williams, PhD. He worked at the University of Texas
for many years and authored many publications, among them Biochemical
Individuality (1956).
Dr.
Williams was a famous nutritional theorist and scholar who discovered
pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) and wrote many scientific papers.
The
principle has many implications. For example, measures such as the RDA (recommended daily
allowance) or MDR (minimum daily requirement) mean little or nothing in
practice. Their only value is as a
minimal baseline assessment of human nutritional needs.
Sadly,
most of Europe and Asia have adopted the MDRs as their nutritional standards
and donÕt even allow supplements to contain much more than a small multiple of
these levels. This could happen
easily in America as well if people do not object strenuously. It would be another health disaster, in
my opinion.
Another
implication of this axiom is that all nutritional balancing programs must be
tailored for each individual.
This, of course, we do and is a critical step in getting well. For this reason, just following general
nutrition guidelines in a book, for example, is often not enough to become
well.
Another
implication is that each person must understand his or her own needs. One must not just copy the diet,
lifestyle of other nutritional program of a friend or even a family member.
This
means that one must find out how much rest one really needs, for example, and
not just guess based on anyoneÕs opinion.
The same goes for food needs.
The exception
to the principles is that a professional with years of experience or someone
with lots of research data can estimate needs fairly well. That is what we attempt to do in all
cases.
Patients
have to be warned that taking extra vitamins or herbs, or altering dosage
levels can easily spoil the entire program because the program is designed
specially for that individual.
However,
at times, clients must modify even our nutritional balancing programs to fit
their needs. This can be very
critical for healing. A wise
practitioner understands this principle and will modify his or her
recommendations based upon feedback from the patient or client.
Biochemical
individuality applies to drugs, too, to a lesser degree. One reason
for drug medicine failures and side effects is that some need far more than
others. This fact can make drug
therapy quite dangerous if one is dealing with pharmaceutical products that are
somewhat toxic.
METABOLIC TYPING
Definition.
Human beings can be classified
into various body types or other types, biochemically, physically,
psychologically or in other ways. This concept is most helpful to simpiify
and avoid mistakes in recommending diets, nutritional supplements,
detoxification protocols, and for psychological and personality assessment and
more.
Metabolic
typing is a refinement of the idea of biochemical individuality. It counters the idea that we are all
random and unique by suggesting that within the variability of human beings are
certain patterns of nutrient needs and other parameters.
It is
very much a systems concept that is essential for nutritional balancing science
and many other natural healing approaches.
Examples
of metabolic typing systems abound. They include the ancient Chinese idea of
yin and yang, the Ayurvedic three doshas, Hippocrates melancholic and
phlegmatic and others.
WatsonÕs
Oxidation Types. A modern metabolic classification system was developed by
George Watson, PhD. He was a
researcher at the University of California Los Angeles in the mid-twentieth
century.
He
happened upon a discovery that paved the way for a gigantic leap in
understanding human physiology. Dr.
WatsonÕs books are fascinating and easy reading. They can usually be found in used book stores. They are Nutrition and Your Mind (1972) and Personality Strength and Psychochemical
Energy (1979).
Fast
and slow oxidation. The two basic types he identified he first
called type one and type two.
Later he realized that one group metabolized fats better than
carbohydrates, and the other was the reverse.
He then
changed the names to fast and slow oxidizers. The word oxidation means to mix
with oxygen or to burn.
He
theorized a third group, the sub-oxidizers, who did not fit into either the
fast or slow categories.
His
original work used odor tests.
Later he added blood tests of pH and carbon dioxide levels.
WatsonÕs
concept is so important for nutritional balancing that the details of the
system, as modified by Dr. Paul Eck and others, is described in a separate
article entitled Fast and slow Oxidation.
Foods and nutrients and the oxidation types. Dr. WatsonÕs
greatest contribution, perhaps, was his research on the effects of common food
groups and supplementary nutrients on the oxidation rate and oxidation type. This is discussed in the same article
on oxidation.
ORTHOMOLECULAR NUTRITION
Definition.
This is the principle of using
natural or physiological substances such as vitamins and minerals, given in the
amounts the body needs, to correct disease conditions.
This term
was coined by the late Dr. Linus Pauling, PhD, winner of two Nobel prizes. It was a radical idea when it was
proposed, but has since been vindicated clearly. Thus it does not seem as odd or radical today.
This is
also a refinement of the biochemical individuality concept because it
postulates that each person may need different amounts of certain nutrients to
correct his or her body chemistry.
Dr.
Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD. The best known application of this
theory of medicine was pioneered by dr. Abram Hoffer, MD, author of Orthomolecular
Nutrition, several other books and
many scientific papers.
Dr.
Hoffer was a psychiatrist who noticed that after the Korean war ended,
prisoners of war who had been starved in the North Korean concentration camps
had mental symptoms that suggested deficiencies of B vitamins thiamine, niacin
and pyridoxine at times as well.
As a
result, he prescribed standard doses of vitamins to help the men. However, there was little
response! Then, by chance, a
patient took a much larger dose of the vitamins and made a complete recovery.
Dr.
Hoffer immediately tried the same idea on the other patients and had similarly
fantastic responses. Although he was
ostracized by his colleagues, he continued to obtain excellent results in some
cases of schizophrenia, other pychoses, depression and other mental illnesses
by giving very high doses of basic vitamins. In this way the science of orthomolecular psychiatry and
orthomolecular medicine was born.
Dr.
Hoffer has written several popular books and many journal articles. He founded the Journal of
Orthomolecular Psychiatry, which, in 1986,
was renamed the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine.
I had the
good fortune to meet Dr. Hoffer, a very humble and brilliant man. He allowed me to contribute an article to
his journal entitled ÒDetermination Of Oxidation Types By Means Of Tissue
Electrolyte RatiosÓ. It appeared
in 1986, Vol. 1, #2. pp. 126-131.
I also
helped author an article for the same issue of the journal regarding the
effects of washing hair at the hair testing laboratory. The official author was Dr. Raymond
Leroy, DSc., chief chemist at Accutrace Laboratories where the studies were
done.
Nutritional
balancing is a type of orthomolecular approach. However, it differs
from others in several important respects:
1. Nutritional
balancing is not a symptom-based approach.
Most orthomolecular nutrition is
based on overcoming symptoms only.
Few tests are used and large doses are required. Also, the patient must usually remain
on the vitamin regimen forever or symptoms will return because underlying
imbalances are not addressed in many, though not all cases.
In
contrast, in nutritional balancing, diet, supplementary nutrients and lifestyle
are generally not used to alleviate symptoms directly. They are employed to delicately move
the organism to a more desirable oxidation state. In other words, we use a balancing approach, not a
symptom-based approach to healing the body.
2. Nutritional
balancing vitamin and mineral doses are usually not as high as in traditional
orthomolcular approaches. Dr. Eck did not like using very high
dosages of nutrients, even vitamin C.
He reasoned that these are drug dosages, basically, when used at these
doses. They are less safe and,
though they can remove symptoms, they rarely balance the body. Also, they are rarely necessary if we
can restore the biochemical pathways instead of just bridging over the trouble
spots with megadoses of nutrients.
However,
he knew that many people have impaired digestion and absorption of
nutrients. Therefore, the nutrient
dosages we do use are still far higher than the minimum daily requirements so
that the patient at least gets a physiological dose delivered to the tissues.
3. As
a result, with nutritional balancing one rarely needs to stay on the nutrients
forever. Balancing the oxidation rate and removing toxic metals and
toxic chemicals usually results in greater energy production. This, in turn, allows and facilitates
normal healing processes. Since
the problem actually disappears, there is usually no need to keep taking the
vitamins, at least not a full program, to maintain optimum health.
THE MINERAL SYSTEM.
Definition.
Each mineral in the soil, in plants and in animal bodies affects the
levels of all the other minerals.
This amazing discovery was the work of Dr. William
Albrecht, a soil scientist who worked at the University of Missouri in the
early twentieth century. He
designed the Òmineral wheelÓ illustrating some of these complex interactions.
His
work is collected in The Albrecht Papers, some of which are highly technical. Dr. Albrecht is widely published in
other agricultural journals as well.
This
forms a system of minerals that is essentially self-balancing or
self-regulating in the soil and human beings. It was a great systems conceptual breakthrough that is used
in agriculture and now can be used in nutritional balancing and nutritional
science.
Dr.Paul
C. Eck stumbled upon AlbrechtÕs work and used the concepts to explain many
paradoxes that he encountered in understanding how to interpret hair tissue
mineral analyses. For example, to
raise the calcium level one must give copper, not calcium. To raise the sodium level, one gives
manganese and so forth.
The
interactions are quite complex, though we donÕt need too much complexity to
make use of the system. The
relationships of the minerals in the soil are somewhat similar to the
interaction of minerals in human and animal bodies, though they are not
identical.
THE WELLNESS
MODEL OF HEALTH
Definitions. Wellness if the idea that health is not
simply the absence of diagnosed disease.
Instead, it is a positive concept, perhaps related to vitality or high
resistance to illness.
This is a wonderful idea, but has not been elaborated in a rigorous scientific way that I am aware of.&n